Skip to content
MatterGraph
Immigration

Keep dates, interviews, and records in one chronology.

Immigration teams may need to reconcile accounts collected over several sessions with statements, translations, identity records, and country information.

Where the factual work sits

Illustrative

AFTER THE RETAINERTHE FACTUAL RECORDSTILL OPENClient statementText messagesPolice reportMedical recordWitness statementCollision on I-10Therapy beginsWage loss unsupported
  • After the retainer
  • Before the drafting
  • Attorney reviewed
The problem

The declaration is only as good as the intake behind it.

Clients recount events across several sessions, sometimes years after they happened, frequently while managing trauma. Dates move between tellings. A relative mentioned once becomes central three weeks later.

Recording each account as a dated event with its source attached gives counsel a reviewable record and makes conflicts between sessions easier to find and clarify.

  • Approximate and unknown dates recorded honestly rather than guessed
  • Affidavit requests tracked from the moment a relative is mentioned
  • Conflicts between intake sessions surfaced for clarification
  • Documents needing translation flagged rather than stalling silently

Typical evidence set

affidavitidentity_documentpolice_reportmedical_recordphotomessagecountry_conditions

Documents can be linked to the events they support so counsel can review the source record while preparing a declaration draft.

Drafts require attorney review

A generated declaration is a starting point assembled from the structured record. It is not filing-ready, it is not legal advice to the client, and it does not go anywhere without an attorney reviewing, editing, and approving it.

For your team

Where it helps most.

Multi-session intake

Accounts collected over several sittings stay in one structure instead of several sets of notes.

Affidavit chasing

A relative or witness mentioned during intake can become a tracked follow-up after the firm reviews the suggestion.

Consistency before the hearing

Conflicts between what was said in March and what was said in July are surfaced while they can still be understood.

Across sessions

An account collected over several sittings.

These matters are rarely told in one conversation, and often not in one language. The record has to hold what was said each time rather than only the latest version.

  1. Step 01

    First account

    The client describes events that may be years in the past, frequently through an interpreter. Dates arrive as periods rather than days, and are recorded as approximate rather than rounded to something exact.

    Approximate dates kept
  2. Step 02

    Follow-up sessions

    Detail is added over time, and a relative mentioned once in passing may become central weeks later. Each session attaches to the same chronology instead of producing a separate set of notes.

    One record
  3. Step 03

    Where sessions disagree

    When a later account differs from an earlier one, both remain on the record and the difference is raised for a person to understand. Nothing is silently replaced.

    Both versions kept
  4. Step 04

    Supporting records

    Statements from relatives, official records, and country material attach to the events they support, and anything still needing translation is tracked rather than stalling quietly.

    Translation tracked
Record status

The states a supporting record moves through.

  • Requested

    Asked for from a relative, an agency, or the client, and not yet received.

  • Received, needs translation

    In hand but not yet usable. Tracked so it does not sit unnoticed.

  • Translated, needs review

    Readable, and waiting on someone at the firm to assess it.

  • Linked

    Reviewed and attached to the specific event it supports.

  • Unavailable

    Confirmed as not obtainable, recorded with the reason rather than left open.

Questions from immigration firms.

Accounts change between sessions. Is that treated as a problem?
It is treated as information. Recollection of events under stress, recalled years later, is expected to shift. Both versions stay on the record and the difference is surfaced for a person to understand rather than being resolved automatically.
Does it draft the declaration?
It can assemble a draft from the reviewed record, which is a starting point requiring attorney review, editing, and verification. It is not filing-ready and does not advise on what should be included.
How is interpreted intake handled?
The account can be entered on the client’s behalf, and it lands in the same structure as a client-entered one. Language handling is tracked as a record status rather than assumed.

Collect an account across several sessions.

Guided questions that add detail over time without asking the client to start again.