Pilot terms first. Public pricing later.
Public pricing is not set. Each pilot receives written scope, duration, support, and fees before it begins. The longer-term model is still being tested.
Every fact keeps its source
Illustrative
How it is structured.
Firm-based team access
The current commercial direction uses the firm as the customer and team access as the primary pricing unit.
Client participation included
Client access is expected to be part of the matter workflow rather than a separate consumer subscription.
Usage limits are undecided
Matter volume, storage, model usage, and support limits have not been packaged into public plans.
What a pilot can evaluate.
A pilot can cover the guided interview, timeline, evidence tracker, review flags, task board, and draft exports because those pieces need to be judged as one workflow.
Commercial packaging is not final. Written pilot scope controls what is included in a specific evaluation.
Which system holds which part of the work.
These categories are built for different jobs. The question is not which is better, but which one already holds each piece of a matter at your firm.
| Capability | Lead intake toolsCapture and qualify new enquiries | Case managementRun the matter once it is open | MatterGraphBuild the factual record |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capture and qualify an enquiryForms, routing, and conversion tracking before a client signs | Lead intake toolsYes | Case managementPartly | MatterGraphNot covered |
| Matter, billing, and docketingTime, invoices, deadlines, and trust accounting | Lead intake toolsNot covered | Case managementYes | MatterGraphNot covered |
| Store and search documents | Lead intake toolsPartly | Case managementYes | MatterGraphPartly |
| Structure the client account into dated eventsA chronology built from what the client actually said | Lead intake toolsNot covered | Case managementNot covered | MatterGraphYes |
| Link a document to the specific fact it supports | Lead intake toolsNot covered | Case managementPartly | MatterGraphYes |
| Track which supporting records are still outstanding | Lead intake toolsNot covered | Case managementPartly | MatterGraphYes |
| Place conflicting statements side by side for review | Lead intake toolsNot covered | Case managementNot covered | MatterGraphYes |
| Decide what the facts meanLegal judgement, in every column | Lead intake toolsYour firm | Case managementYour firm | MatterGraphYour firm |
A statement of scope, not of quality. Products within each category differ, and many firms run all three. MatterGraph is designed to sit alongside a case management system rather than replace one.
What MatterGraph deliberately does not do.
Some of these are common revenue lines for legal software. They are outside what this product is for.
Client billing and payments
MatterGraph does not process payments or generate invoices for your clients.
E-signature
Signing flows are handled by tools built for that purpose.
Court filing
Nothing is filed with any court by this system, at any tier.
CRM and marketing
This is not a lead pipeline. It begins once a client is already yours.
Legal research
MatterGraph organizes the facts of your matter. It does not research the law.
Legal advice
No tier provides legal advice to clients or determines the merit of a claim. Attorney review is required for every output.
Pilot pricing is a conversation
Pilot terms are set individually and confirmed in writing. The agreement should state scope, duration, support, data boundaries, any fee, and how either side can end the evaluation.
Questions about cost.
- Why are there no numbers on this page?
- Because pricing is not final. Publishing precise figures before scope, support, and usage assumptions are settled would create false certainty.
- Will pricing change after the pilot?
- The commercial model may change as the product matures. A written pilot agreement should state the term, price, and change process for that evaluation.
- Do we need to replace our practice management system?
- No. MatterGraph covers the intake and fact-development stage that happens before a clean case file exists. It is not a practice management system and does not try to become one.
- What happens to our data if we stop using it?
- Export, retention, deletion, and backup handling must be defined in the written agreement. MatterGraph does not claim ownership of a firm’s case content.
Test the workflow on a representative matter.
Start with a synthetic or fully redacted matter. An initial evaluation does not require live client data.